Lady Litigator – Lisa Fantino

Award winning NY journalist turned attorney with an opinion about everything!

Archive for Bloggers

Westchester attorney proud of ruffling feathers in the race for District Attorney

A few weeks back I had the pleasure of taking part in the Democratic primary debate for Westchester County District Attorney, hosted by News 12 Westchester.  I was one of three seasoned journalists on the panel.  The format allowed journalists to ask a question but not respond when the candidates criticized the question or answered in a way that deserved a follow-up comment or response.  That’s where the political squabble took an interesting turn.  You see, I thought it was interesting that an incumbent District Attorney was not getting the support of the police, local and county, in such an important election.  So it was agreed, among the panelists, that I would ask the D.A. about the soured relations with the front line men and women of law enforcement.

Westchester incumbent D.A. Janet DiFiore

Westchester incumbent D.A. Janet DiFiore

My question to incumbent DA Janet DiFiore asked what she would do to improve relations with the police department since the County PBA had endorsed Republican challenger Dan Schorr.  Ms. DiFiore jumped at me like a vulture at a turkey hunt, claiming I did not know what I was speaking about and I was not allowed to respond.  I have since come to learn that there are two “county” PBAs in Westchester which play off of each other for political reasons with a slight derivation in their names.  There is the PBA of Westchester and there is also the Westchester County PBA.  The first is a fraternal organization and the second represents the active rank and file officers.

I was not wrong, as Ms.  DiFiore had alleged on September 9th because the PBA of Westchester had endorsed Mr. Schorr in June – three months before the primary debate.  More importantly, and subsequent to the debate, the  Westchester County PBA , as I anticipated, also endorsed Mr. Schorr on October 5th.  Most counties have only one PBA; here in Westchester we have two and BOTH have endorsed the Republican challenger for District Attorney. Therefore, no matter how you slice it and no matter how Ms. Di Fiore wants to color it, the black and white of it is that she does not have the support of the county police.

Westchester police support Dan Schorr for D.A.

Westchester police support Dan Schorr for D.A.

It seems Ms. DiFiore and her camp have spent so much time this campaign season calling everyone on alleged misinformation that they haven’t bothered to look in the mirror and review where in fact the D.A. has gone wrong by losing the support of the TWO county PBAs.    In fact, as of today, there is still “misleading” information on Ms. DiFiore’s campaign website, making it appear as though she does have the support of the Westchester County PBA because the Affiliated Police Association of Westchester has endorsed her and one of their member organizations happens to be the Westchester County PBA.  I was looking forward to re-visiting the issue in the upcoming News 12 debate when DiFiore would face off against Schorr.  Unfortunately, I have been “uninvited” to the dance.  I have been told that management at News 12 didn’t want a “blogger” on the air and that certain campaign staffers asked that I not make another appearance.

Hmmm, this “blogger” has probably won more national and international journalism awards than everyone else together on the primary debate panel.  And as a former network news anchor, this journalist was and still is known for impeccable research.  This “blogger” is also admitted to the bar in two states, a federal circuit court and the Supreme Court of the United States.  I guess this “blogger” knows what she’s doing because to be asked not to come back in this case is a distinction I wear proudly.  Free speech is not free if candidates can screen the jury.

Westchester attorney mystified by irresponsible media on Michael Jackson’s will

For more than twenty years I was a respected member of the New York press corps, an award-winner, someone who worked as a network anchor and street reporter.  Today, I am disgusted by this rush to report by the established media, spurred on by the rash of so-called “citizen journalists” ala Twitter.

As professionals, I would expect you to rise above the barrage of tweets and posts in the blogosphere.  I would expect you to know what you are talking about by doing your homework and interviewing sources.  Does anyone even remember how to check sources any longer?  Or are all of you so in a rush to beat the other guy at getting it wrong?

All day I have listened to irresponsible reporting.  I have heard veteran news reporters say “the children go to Jackson’s mother Katherine.”  That is just wrong.  Have they read the will?  Do they understand its meaning?  Have they bothered to interview an estates attorney?  Obviously not.  The will declares Michael’s desire that the children remain in the custody of his mother but it’s not Jackson’s choice.  A court, probably in August, will consider his testamentary desire but does not have to be bound by it.  Yet, no one has reported that today – at least none of the several stations which I listened to in New York.

Further, everyone is making hay out of the fact that he purposefully declares that he is leaving nothing to his ex-wife, Debbie Rowe.

photo courtesy:  DailyMail.co.uk

photo courtesy: DailyMail.co.uk

Did any reporter bother to find out that such a statement is standard will drafting language when there has been a divorce?  While a divorce will generally eliminate either spouse’s rights to the other’s estate, when there is such a large estate to be probated, attorneys do not take chances and make sure that the testator indicates the ex-spouse is in fact “ex” and as such she gets nothing.  It is not to slap the woman in the face; it is legal reinforcement of her lack of rights.

The state of journalism in this country, which leads the media in global coverage, mystifies me.  However, I guess it shouldn’t.  The handwriting was on the wall back in 1993 when I decided to go to law school.  I knew we were doomed when a desk assistant had not read one newspaper before coming in for an 11 a.m. shift the day John F. Kennedy Jr. had died; meanwhile, I had been up since 2 a.m. covering the news.  Bravo, Twitter, you’ve just placed the icing on the proverbial cake.

Westchester attorney wonders if MySpace and Facebook will now be one in the same with the change at the top.

Now that former Facebook COO Owen Van Natta has gone over to the top spot at MySpace, what will happen to the world of social networking? My guess is that MySpace should get back to its musical roots. It was started as a site for new bands to preview their material and create a fan base; yet, what it’s become is a market for soft-porn, cyber sex and voyeurism. Personally, that’s why I left it and jumped ship to Facebook, which seems to be more professional and more about networking.

Clearly, News Corp. which owns a major stake in MySpace realizes the best way to get over on the competition is to bring over one from their camp.Variety’s techno blogger Ben Fitz reports that’s just what News Corp.’s digital head honcho, Jon Miller, intended with the hiring of Van Natta.

It would seem to me with so much “socializing” going on at Facebook, Friendster and Twitter, the best way to stand out would be for MySpace to return to its entertainment roots.

Older entries »